Apple Posts an Apology to Samsung Based on UK High Court's Decision
It was a few days ago when Apple lost an appeal against Samsung. The UK High Court of Justice's decision forced Apple to make a public apology to the other company.

Apple accused Samsung for infringing the design of Apple's iPad but Judge Colin Biriss decided that the Galaxy Tab "do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design -- They are not as cool.".

The decision requires Apple to post a notice on its website and in newspapers. The order said that the company should post an apology with a font size of at least Arial 14.

Now, Apple posted an "apology" note to their website as the decision required them. Though, netizens react to the issue saying that this post doesn't seem to sound as an apology. Here is a copy of Apple's post:

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited's Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple's registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal's judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.


Source: http://www.apple.com/uk/legal-judgement/

So what can you say about this post of Apple? Do you think the UK's judge made a fair decision?

3 comments :

  1. I think the decision was a fair one, but that isn't an apology. They don't apologise at all in it, surely that's the most important part of an apology? Not patting themselves on the back for raping the patent system?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looks like Apple is currently displaying shorter version of that note on their site- Which now kind of just a statement. ;))

    ReplyDelete
  3. wow.. I didn't saw that update.. :)

    apple probably saw the sudden traffic brought by curious netizens.. hehehe

    ReplyDelete